Skip to content
← The intelligence layer

Type the question you would send to an analyst. Get the analysis an analyst would run.

Ask AI reads your question, decides which analysis answers it, and calls the services that hold the numbers. The attribution service supplies credit, the business metrics service supplies CAC and ROAS, your CRM supplies lead and opportunity quality, your finance system supplies collected revenue and margin. The model assembles and explains the answer; it computes no part of it. Where the four layers disagree, the answer shows the disagreement instead of averaging it away.

In practice

Demo data

Why is Meta outperforming Google after CRM qualification?

Because the gap only appears once the CRM is counted. Google recorded 41 leads last week and the CRM qualified 3 of them, while Meta's leads qualify at roughly the 11% blended rate and its customers sit at a CAC of €121 against Google's €184. Evidence: the 14-day metrics window, CRM opportunity stages, and invoiced value from your finance system, under the last-non-direct rule. Business impact: Google's bid strategy is being paid for form fills that rarely become opportunities, across €17,200 a month. Confidence is high on the CAC gap and medium on the qualification rate, because 41 leads is a thin week. One alternative explanation is that Google's mix leaned on a broad-match campaign that ran a new landing page for four of those days. Recommended action is ACT-2294: change the value signal sent back to Google from Lead to Qualified Opportunity. Constitution check passes — scaling needs 30 qualified outcomes and 34 are recorded.

A question becomes a query plan

"Why is Meta outperforming Google after qualification?" resolves into a window, a cohort, an attribution rule and four service calls. The plan is shown next to the answer, so you can see what was counted before you decide whether to trust the conclusion.

Four layers, never one score

Platform ROAS of 5.1, attributed 3.8 and margin 2.7 are three answers to three different questions about the same campaign. Ask AI returns all three and names which one your objective is actually judged on.

Follow-ups keep the context

Narrow to Germany, stretch the window to 90 days, or switch the attribution rule, and the same plan re-runs against the same services. Nothing is re-estimated in conversation — every follow-up goes back to the metrics layer.

Demo data

Behind one answer

Answer
Meta. Its customers are credited with €14,800 more collected 90-day revenue than Google's on 15% less spend.
Evidence
311 customers, 90-day window, invoiced value from the finance system, last-non-direct attribution.
Business impact
Moving €1,200/day would add an estimated 31 customers this month.
Confidence
High — 14 days above the minimum evidence threshold.
Alternative explanation
Meta's audience skews to annual plans. Some of the gap is plan mix rather than channel quality.
Recommended action
Move €1,200/day from Google Prospecting to Meta Prospecting.
Constitution check
Passes — within the €1,500/day movement limit.

One goal. Every channel. Real business truth.

Connect your ad accounts, say what a good customer is worth, and let the Growth Brain work the objective inside limits you set.

No ad spend commitment · Connect one channel to start · [email protected]